The
first music therapy lecturer explained how to give a series of lectures. He did this by comparing it with
running a series of laps around an athletics track. First, he collected the students’ progress in understanding
an idea. Then, he returned to the
front desk, indicating he was ready for their questions. Then, they asked questions to help
themselves understand the idea completely. In this way, the first music therapy lecturer explained how
to give a series of lectures by comparing it with running a series of laps
around an athletics track.
The
comparative class actions lecturer marketed a business to a hierarchy. He did this by computing which person
in a parent-child relationship will perform a classical action to interest the
other one in the book. First, he
counted the number of actions in the book that the child had performed, a. Then, he calculated the number of
actions in the book that the parent had performed, b. If a > b, then the child should interest the parent in
the book, otherwise, vice versa.
In this way, the comparative class actions lecturer marketed a business
to a hierarchy by computing which person in a parent-child relationship will
perform a classical action to interest the other one in the book.
The
second music therapy lecturer tested that it was correct that an experiment had
been completed in time. He did this
by testing that the water in a test tube had boiled. First, he tested that the air near the top of the test tube
was hot. Second, he tested that
there was a bubble near the surface of the water in the test tube at a point
during the time tested. Third, he
tested that there was audible bubbling of the water in the test tube. In this way, the second music therapy
lecturer tested that it was correct that an experiment had been completed in
time by testing that the water in a test tube had boiled.
The
comparative constitutional law lecturer tested that an action had been
completed in time. He did this by
testing that the action stopped at time t. First, he tested that the action was continuing, like it was
expected to do. Then, he repeated
this until the action had stopped.
When the action had stopped at the same time as it had been expected to,
then the action had stopped at time t.
In this way, the comparative constitutional law lecturer tested that an
action had been completed in time, by testing that the action stopped at time
t.
The
third music therapy lecturer computed how to eat food. She did this by aiming the forkful of
food into her mouth. First, she
wrote down the co-ordinates of the bottom-left hand corner, (0, 0) and
top-right hand corner, (0.03, 0.03) of her mouth. Then, where x1 = width of her mouth and x2
= width of the food, she calculated x3 = left x co-ordinate of food
= x1/2 – x2/2 = (0.03 – 0) / 2 – 0.01 / 2 = 0.015 – 0.005
= 0.01 m. Then, where y1
= height of her mouth and y2 = height of the food, she calculated y3
= bottom y co-ordinate of food = y1/2 – y2/2 = (0.03 – 0)
/ 2 – 0.01 / 2 = 0.015 – 0.005 = 0.01 m.
In this way, the third music therapy lecturer computed how to eat food by
aiming the forkful of food into her mouth.
No comments:
Post a Comment